Being Cross About the Batu Gajah Cross
By Mariam Mokhtar
In late October, some workmen turned up at St Bernadette’s Convent in Batu Gajah and were seen trying to remove a cross which was on the outer wall of the school. They tried to hang the school badge, to cover the cross, but that did not work. Why cover the cross at all?
The workmen at St Bernadette’s tried to put a white strip over the cross, but that only made it look terrible.
By this time, a crowd had gathered, some of whom happened to be former pupils of St Bernadette’s. They rang the school to complain about workers defacing the school cross and the wall. The police were also called, to report the vandalism. Parents and former pupils wanted the original wall to be restored.
Such was their fury that the school administrators were forced to tell the workmen to stop work until a solution was found. In the meantime, the police and officials from the Department of Education arrived.
Today, the wall has been restored to its original state. As one convent old girl said, “So why was this an attempt to remove the cross? Is this bureaucracy gone mad? Why can’t they leave the mission schools alone?”
In 2015, the Kedah housing Exco, Tajul Urus Mat Zain, demanded that a property housing developer, on Langkawi island modify the design of the roofs and air-wells, because they resembled a row of crosses.
He claimed that the problem was a “sensitive issue of a religious nature”; others claimed that the crosses were a covert attempt at proselytisation. Why are these people allowing their paranoia to overcome common sense?
For decades, generations and countless thousands of Malay Muslim children attended mission schools, sang carols and hymns, quietly stood to attention whilst their Christian peers said the Lord’s Prayer, during morning assembly.
These Malay children would have seen the crucifix on a daily basis. The crucifix was hung in classrooms, in chapel and around the nuns’ and the brothers’ necks. Mission school badges had the cross incorporated in the badge design, but in the 80s, the crosses were removed.
Today, the Muslims who attended mission schools, are still Muslims. Their close proximity to the cross, in their youth, had not made them yearn to be Christians. The children of many Sultans also enrolled at mission schools.
On the other hand, are the Malay Muslims of today, so weak and their aqidah (faith) so fragile, that they imagine that looking at a cross will make them become Christians? Or is the fear of the cross, a politically manufactured scare tactic?
Could the fear of the cross, be a reason why many Malay children performed badly at arithmetic, because they are afraid of the addition (+) and multiplication (x) symbols?
If one looks at the keris, the sheath resembles a cross. Should the Malays alter the design of the keris and its shaft?
From above, aeroplanes resemble a cross.
Should the Civil Works Department contact the Ministry of Transport to redesign all the crossroads in Malaysia?
What will the thousands of elderly Malay women, who have taken up cross-stitch as a hobby, do? Will they have to abandon their favourite past-time?
Does this mean, that Malaysians cannot savour hot cross buns? Apart from being linked with Easter, the cross, made of shortcrust pastry, which is baked on top of the bun, will cause the most damage to Muslims, once it is ingested.
Many electricity pylons will have to be dismantled, as well as BMW motor cars.
In English, English literature and mathematics, all words and symbols which contain a cross, will have to be banned.
There would be a seismic shift in learning and in education, when fields like engineering, language, science (hybridisation as in cross-breeding), religion, plumbing (pipe-fittings), astronomy (The Southern Cross), sports (boxing) and law (cross-examination), have to be revamped.
A few years ago, the Perak Mufti, Harussani, banned Malays from wearing Barcelona football jerseys, because of the cross symbol. His suggestion was met with outrage. The Malays love their football. Harussani back-pedaled and said that it was merely a “suggestion” when faced with their wrath.
The precedent of banning the cross or defacing surfaces which contain the cross, as happened at St Bernadette’s Convent, sets an unhealthy precedent.
Prohibiting the use of the cross, or trying to obliterate it from public view, will only stifle creativity and imagination. Why should we fear the cross? The cross does not proselytise. Claiming that the Muslim faith is weak, and that we could become proselytised, by seeing the cross, is preposterous.
Once the cross is banned, there will be a slew of other items, which the bigots will soon demand, to be removed from the public sphere.
In the end, it is not Muslim sensitivities which we are protecting, but the power of a few, who manipulate how we think, and act. It is all about control.
NB: Merry Christmas & a Happy New Year. Best Wishes for 2018.