By: Rosli Mansor Ahmad Razali
The announcement by Tourism Perak of 8.4 million tourist arrivals to the state in 2024 has sparked heated discussions among netizens.
A report titled “Perak Achieved Target of 8.4 Million Tourists in 2024”, published on Ipoh Echo and Peraktastic’s Facebook pages on January 1, 2025, has become the subject of sharp criticism.
While the figures look impressive on paper, the reality on the ground paints a starkly different picture.
Many have questioned the validity of these statistics and, more importantly, their impact on the economy and the quality of life for locals.
Here are some biting comments from netizens that, though critical, should serve as constructive feedback for the state government and Tourism Perak to consider.
Questionable Statistics
Netizens such as Erik Chang and Andy Bandara have openly questioned the transparency of the figures. Are these numbers genuinely reflective of tourists who stayed and spent money in Perak, or do they merely count highway stopovers?
If these tourists indeed brought significant impact, why hasn’t the local economy felt the “fresh breath” of their spending? The numbers, critics argue, seem to project more illusion than reality.
Another recurring issue tarnishing Perak’s reputation is its poorly maintained infrastructure.
Fakrul Hizam and Zachary Ng sarcastically remarked that visitors now have the “privilege” of experiencing the same pothole-riddled roads that locals endure daily.
This reflects the glaring failure of local authorities to maintain basic amenities, which should be a source of pride, not ridicule.
Abandoned Projects: Legacy or Liability?
A comment by Anie Alja highlighted the persistent problem of abandoned projects in the city.
From derelict buildings to incomplete roads, these eyesores stand as a testament to administrative shortcomings.
Not only do they mar the cityscape, but they also erode public confidence in governance.
Tourism Without Impact?
Siti Amni cynically noted that locals only “gaze blankly” at supposedly viral attractions allegedly swarmed by tourists.
Meanwhile, social media, often a mirror of tourism vibrancy, seems devoid of such buzz.
If 8.4 million tourists truly visited, where is the economic and social impact that should have followed?
Conclusion
Perak undoubtedly has immense potential as a tourism destination, but potential alone isn’t enough.
Questionable statistics, neglected infrastructure, and the inability to attract tourists to stay longer are glaring weaknesses.
The state government and Tourism Perak must address these shortcomings swiftly. Perak cannot afford to be a state that thrives only on paper while failing to deliver on the ground.
There is still time to prove that Perak is brimming with potential, not just indulging in self-praise.
